How can you be a risk to one child but not the other
Yes that’s right, CAFCASS are a bunch of imbeciles. After speaking to them on Monday and explaining that their report was very one sided, that there was no request or suggestions that information should be sought from medical records, or the video evidence that proves its all lies. They then agreed it was not there but still said it was not bias.
My solicitor requested I be allowed fully supervised contact, which I would bear the cost of. This was put before the court, who then asked CAFCASS “what do you think?” Who turned round and said no.
What is this world coming to?
A fully supervised visit has been turned down! WTF!
I mean come on what could I possibly do?
I asked this question, to which my wife’s solicitor quickly stood up and responded with “well he could easily sneak in tablets in to the contact session and give them to Emma” What sort of nonsense is this, if this is not a blatant attempt to just stop access for no reason then I do not know what is.
I also said to Wendy Nugent from CAFCASS, so you don’t support any contact with my daughter?, to which she agreed. After hearing her answer i then said, so you should stop me seeing my son also? There reply was, well we spoke to social services about your son and there aren’t any problems or cause for concern.
Can you believe it!!!
How can you be a risk to one child but not the other?
CAFCASS, Wendy Nugent, or even anyone from the Family Court system. If by any chance you ever come across this blog and read this. Get your act together. Putting the children first? My ass you do. Its more like putting the mothers first, and screwing over the fathers with any chance you get.